no if

eSIM – A gift or a curse?

A decade ago, the GSMA started work building up a norm for RSP specs. for machine to machine (M2M), with the normalization of eSIM technology for consumer solutions continuing in 2015. The GSMA standard, notwithstanding organizing the security and assurance of customer data, tries to limit industry disturbance, guaranteeing similarity of eSIM specs. with existing telecom frameworks and processes. It showcases an advancement of the SIM from the customary model, with the present telecom measures remaining unaltered and MNOs holding command over the client relationship.

Be that as it may, more troublesome eSIM situations could emerge from the more extensive adoption of devices with non-GSMA standard eSIM technology. This model is like the Apple SIM in which a delegate, be it an OTT or OEM, totals all network carrier offers and permits clients to choose plans from a rundown to quickly change carriers. These kind of business model infers direct rivalry because of more price transparency  and the incomplete loss of the client relationship for MNOs.

There's likewise dread that different players (for example OEMs) may dislodge the MNO’s role, taking responsibility for entire client relationship. In this model, an OEM can give its own telecom offering to purchasers, going about as a MVNO and wholesaling availability from MNOs. Also, it could bring more serious rivalry among operators. The capacity to switch immediately between carriers will additionally disintegrate user faithfulness and increase turnover.

Users will be effortlessly baited away by cheaper subscription plans, numerous additionally offered by MVNOs who don't need to deal with the sort of overheads customary players do. The simplicity of exchanging carriers could likewise bring about a fall in roaming revenues. Users with an eSIM-empowered device may pick to change to a virtual profile with a nearby carrier when holidaying abroad, rather than picking a roaming bundle offered by their primary carrier.

Operators have been hit with declining incomes from conventional voice and SMS services. Nonetheless, carriers could hope to offer extra subscriptions to their current clients to be the active secondary subscription on the device notwithstanding being the primary subscription to retain the user. For instance, clients who often travel to nations not covered by any global data plans are offered the plans to buy secondary memberships from one of the MNO’s accomplices in different nations.

Likewise, MNOs could generally challenge their rivals, by focusing on clients who are on different cellular network, by selling them new subscription to be the secondary subscription on the device.

In synopsis, the effect on MNO income can fluctuate as indicated by four variables:

  • A decrease in ARPU as buyers are furnished with direct price  transparency and expanded rivalry;
  • A decrease in roaming incomes as users can buy in to local operators when they are abroad;
  • A decrease in device sale as carriers lose the client relationship to OEMs;
  • Also, the potential for 'new' revenue from the sale of new cell phones, for example, wearables and the associated data ARPU increment from connecting a secondary device.

Many MNOs will welcome the concept of eSIMs with worry, yet the move ought to be taken as an opportunity, instead of dreaded as a danger. This goes for telcos, eSIM capable device making companies and all other companies which all remain to make profit from the worldwide connected IoT ecosystem. It is the operator’s duty to guarantee they can uphold the innovation on their network and give a seamless experience…whatsoever…

                                                                                                                                                                                                Author- Tim Jonas


Blogs Home